I’ve done more than 10,000 surgeries and they had little emotional impact on me because I was shut down. There’s no emotional attachment. I know I did it; I earned a good living; I remember things people wrote and cakes people made for me, but there’s no attachment. It’s only after I transitioned that everything has been more real and alive and colorful. We do know that the memories that most vivid and are easiest to retrieve are those with the most emotional content to them, but you need to be receptive.
Wonderful interview of Dana Beyer, MD. Thanks, TEDMED (@TEDMED) team for listening – the best use of technology ever.
A lot happened in health last week, in many dimensions. TEDMED (@tedmed) was a part of it for me. I’m not going to try summarize (because I’ll miss A LOT) but I will add my experience (it’s my RSS feed, after all :)).
The Hive, brought to you by…
For the people and organizations who had a presence in the hive, you/they will know what it takes to create one. A lot of work. How do you distill (in our case) a 9.2 million, 180,000 member/staff strong health system into 500 square feet? You get Susan Terrill , Michelle Soohoo, Holly Potter (@htpotter), Keith Montgomery (@kmontgomeryndc), Diane Gage-Lofgren (@dianelofgren), and Dina Piccoli (@dinapiccoli) to lead you, of course.
Some of us not-so-secretly hoped that we would emerge with a pop-up version of the Kaiser Permanente Center for Total Health (@kptotalhealth) , and I think that happened.
Jess Jacobs (@jess_jacobs) lovingly referred to the experience as “Kaiser (Permanente) is so far past faxing orders that they’re into sustainable apples” (more on her later).
I was part of the Great Challenges “Role of the Patient” Team. Jess Jacobs is a person just starting her life while on a very trying health odyssey. Amy Berman is a person just living her life while avoiding a trying health odyssey. It is an interesting juxtaposition.
During the week, Jess wrote this blog post (see: My Intravenous Lecture | Jess’ Juxtapositions ) that really challenged our thinking about what health care is supposed to be doing for people. Note the bottom image in the post, and then ask what health care is supposed to be doing for the environment around the people. Hint, not what it’s doing today.
And then there was Andrew Solomon
Andrew’s talk “How does an illness become an identity” was the most spoken about all week, at least to me :).
Regardless of the generation we grew up in, we have all lived through an era where name-your-group of people were reduced to illnesses or inhuman because they were misunderstood, or worse.
If you have ever seen or experienced dehumanization as Andrew (@Andrew_Solomon) describes, the antibodies you produce to it will create a level of determination to stop it when you see it again that will surprise and maybe overwhelm you.
This is the story of people with dwarfism, people with trisomy 21, people who are gay, lesbian, or bisexual, and in this era, people who are transgender.
The signature of this situation, people who are not only uncared for and invisible, and further, act as if they don’t deserve care, is unmistakable.
It’s why I have the reaction that I do when artist Regina Holliday (@ReginaHolliday) paints a person with a transgender symbol around them on our crazy life ride. It’s a sign that a vital, forgotten group of people will have an identity, the same feeling of importance that Andrew generated in his talk.
If a TEDMED stage and the art that comes from and around it can lead people to being human, that’s as powerful a producer of health as any I could think of!
I selected my favorite photos below, click to enlarge, curate your own by going to the whole collection: Collection: 2013 TEDMED – KPTCH. All are creative-commons licensed, download away.
Photos of/from TEDMED
Hey, thanks again to the entire TEDMED team including one of my favorite members, Whitney Zatzkin (@MsWz), my colleagues, TEDMED delegates and all the patients and people who will do great things because they’ll get to start living the lives they’ve dreamed of.
This is a blog post written by my community colleague Jess Jacobs (@Jess_Jacobs).
When I saw her at TEDMED and she told me about the patient experience around the diagnosis of here syncopal spells, I think I suggested she write a blog post. I’m not sure – I think I said that if these non-patient-centered approaches to care happen to everyone and no one says anything about them, they will continue.
So she wrote this blog post telling her story.
She did a beautiful job documenting things through photos ( one of my favorite things 🙂 ) and in her story shows the difference between “data” and “facts”. “Data” are things like “X% of hospitals are using electronic health records,” or “100% of the time, patients should be able to access their medical records.” “Facts” are what happens at that highest level of the health system, where the patient receives services.
Read Jess’ story to see if you can see the difference between data and facts. We’re bummed because the facts don’t match the data.
Who knows, maybe the system that created this experience will go on stage at TEDMED and tell the audience that if the patient they disappointed is out there that they’re sorry, too.
Nice thing about Google+ Hangouts on Air is that they automatically post to YouTube….
Here’s the video, it was a lot of fun, and it was only the second or third hangout that I’ve done. I figured out half way through to not speak so loud in to the mic, so apologies if you have to lower the volume to listen, experience is the best teacher :). Head over to the Great Challenges: Role of the Patient page and/or feel free to add comments here. Thanks for participating.
Now is the time to make your mark, by answering 5 key questions that were developed based on the initial responses. Just go to the Great Challenges : Role of the Patient page, log in, choose a question, review team answers (or not), and add yours.
If you take a look at my reposes as part of the team, you’ll find that they’re really “response-lets,” with some gaps and mildly declarative statements. It’s what I do in social media, to create space and understanding that (a) I’m not that smart and my ideas are not that unique (b) we are always at our best when we are not bouncing a ball alone. The bouncing ball concept comes from Regina Holliday (@reginaholliday) with whom I am getting ready to present with at TEDxAlvaPark, in Detroit, Michigan, at the Henry Ford Innovation Institute (@henryfordideas).
If you weren’t sure about jumping in previously, I think this phase is easier to participate in – you don’t have to come up with new questions, just provide your experience. In looking at the responses so far, I would love to know more about who people are. Feel free to write about how you got to care about this issue, what you do now in service to it (or how it doesn’t serve you), so the team can connect with you. Sound good? Head over to TEDMED2013 Great Challenges : Role of the Patient.
Also I’d like to mention Kaiser Permanente colleague Jack Der-Sarkissian, MD (@DrJDS) also a family physician, who’s on the team for Addressing Whole-Patient Care. He’s an expert in the field of obesity and has a lot of experience in inter-specialty collaboration to improve the health of a population.
I consider this to be the “decade of the patient,” which to me means patients will be more involved and more central to what we do in health care than ever. This includes not just access to the information in their medical records, but in the design and operation of the health system itself. Until the day comes when medical professionals always get it right, patient advocates would like to help out, fill in the gaps, save themselves, the people they love, and their society from unnecessary harm. And lots and lots of physicians are going to stand with them.
This statement, authored by me, shouldn’t be that surprising on this blog.
This means that there’s an opportunity to broaden this discussion, in the space that shares my first name, virtually, and on site in Washington, DC, in 2013 (hooray, #epicenter).
As the Challenges web site says, we are not trying to solve problems, just trying to bring in more views:
The mission of TEDMED’s Great Challenges Program is not to solve these complex problems. Instead, we propose to provide America and the world with an unbiased and broadly inclusive view of these challenges, incorporating thoughtful, multidisciplinary perspectives. We seek thoughtful views from doctors, scientists and researchers, of course — but also from technology innovators, business and government leaders, patients, legal experts, representatives of the armed forces, the media, and many more.
During this phase, and until October 1, questions and dialogue are requested – from the general, and I would say to the specific, about the role of the patient. I would especially like to see health professionals and health professionals-in-training participate. What are you learning about the role of the patient in your environment, is a healthy role being taught/reinforced, or is an unhealthy one being taught?
What you need to do is log in to the Great Challenges site at TEDMED.com , and go to the discussion area for The Role of the Patient Great Challenge (direct link). Please pose a question, or two, like a few that you like, add some information or a story in the discussion area below.
The idea here is that more than just a blog here or there can be involved in the discussion. Like so many other things in health and society we want to do better in, it’s time.
Unmet social needs – like access to nutritious food and adequate housing – are leading to worse health for all Americans, according to 85 percent of physicians recently surveyed by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Although most physicians say patients’ social needs are as important to address as their medical conditions, four in five feel they don’t have the capacity to effectively address social needs.
This is health care’s blind side: Within the current health care system, physicians do not have the time or sufficient staff support to address patients’ social needs.
The above is from the Physician’s Daily Life Survey, done in 2011. The images on the right are findings from the study that I thought were interesting. In the first image, it can be seen that physicians in practice understand the limits of medical care and wish they could do more.
The second and third image tell me that maybe there are knowledge gaps, too. And it’s a “maybe” because of the way the questions were asked – do physicians think lack of patient motivation is at the heart of their un-health? Or do they think that lack of motivation to make healthy choices is trumped by motivation to solve greater problems created by community conditions? Social determinant theory would say the latter is true. We can’t know, though, unless we talk to people in more detail.
Finally, there is a discussion on the training of physicians, which was the perfect complement to my time watching TEDMED at AAMC in Washington, DC. I wanted to see TEDMED, however I asked my employer not to purchase a pass for me (which, I’ll be honest was on the very expensive side), so those funds could be used to support other programs for our members. As luck would have it, Lesley Ward reached out to me on behalf of AAMC to watch the live feed at their headquarters, which they sponsored this year, perfect compromise.
So there’s health care’s blind side and then there’s Ted Eytan’s blind side, which is that I am disconnected from the undergraduate medical education system in my daily work. Not only did I get to see great TEDMED speakers, I got to learn more about how this membership organization (much like the one I work for is one) is helping prepare tomorrow’s leaders amongst these discussions about social determinants.
The new MCAT
I had briefly heard about this change, and my last week stimulated my interest to see what the changes are. As the announcement and detailed preview guide shows, there’s now a greater emphasis on Behavioral and Social Sciences.
My curiosity was piqued so I went in to review sample questions relevant to social determinants. There’s a question on 122 of the guide that is about bias in care, and a question on page 125 of the guide that is about health inequalities based on years of education.
If you look on page 110 of the preview guide (I’m not copy-pasting due to copyright restrictions, unless AAMC says it’s okay), it’s impressive to see the description of social inequities, including a discussion of racism and institutional bias on the admissions exam for medical school. Think about it, it’s significant. On top of this, Darrell Kirch, MD, says something very important in introducing the new test , which is that it will encourage pre-medical students to take more sociology and psychology courses to prepare for it.
“Behavioral and Social Science Foundations for Future Physicians”
This is a report published in January, 2012, also by the AAMC that addresses the big picture of social influences in medical education. When I read it I say both, “This really needs to be integrated” AND I say, “there is a LOT that medical students need to learn to be competent physicians.” We need them to be excellent diagnosticians for individuals at the same time we need them to lead health improvement in society. There is a time/bandwidth conflict in these goals, and the examples in the report, which are about specific clinical situations, illustrate this without actually pointing it out.
If people are interested in learning about the journey of our undergraduate medical system to address social determinants, this is a good start.
I also want to reflect on my own undergraduate medical education training. It was as exciting as it was demanding. It was actually fun to learn the secrets of the human body in an adult way (my dad was a doctor, so I knew some of the secrets in a non-adult way). Every day a new organ system or pathology was introduced and there was always more to be fascinated by in this finely tuned orchestra of DNA and cells that wasn’t made by us. Maybe the next phase will be to create that same excitement about the systems that are made by us at the same time, so that we can be great at what is vital for us to be great at, and be terrific collaborators and leaders in the reduction of health inequalities, which we will eventually treat anyway.
That’s the end of this long blog post, see what you think, comments welcome, and a great honor to be in the intersection of so much innovation all at once.