Posts Tagged ‘patient_centered_care’

Photo Friday: The Expanding Room of Supporters for Primary Care

October 20th, 2008 | Popularity: 10%
0 comments | Leave a reply

PCPCC

This week’s photograph (sorry, a few days late) is from the Patient Centered Primary Care Collaborative annual Summit, on October 17, 2008, in Washington, DC. As Edwina Rogers and Paul Grundy, MD, noted, this is a remarkable scene – I remember being at the Summit just two years ago in 2006, when around 40 people were present in this room. They topped out at 385 this time.

PCPCC has been incredibly successful in achieving engagement around a robust primary care system, not just in numbers but in the number of projects and innovators creating them in this room. I thought there was so much energy during the breaks that I might think about a future summit being hosted using an Unconference or BarCamp platform. We can’t let any ideas go unheard!

Stepping Through a Patient’s Experience with Hypertension: Setting Rates and Negotiating Benefits

August 14th, 2008 | Popularity: 38%
0 comments | Leave a reply

This is fourth of a multi-part series on a patient’s experience managing a chronic condition, in this case hypertension. A diagnosis has been made, and our patient has hopefully followed up and has hopefully been maintained on appropriate therapy (there is a 1 in 3 chance that this is happening). Now it is time for our patient’s health care sponsor (such as his employer) to review the health care benefit.

Click on the image to see it larger size

setrates-htn-eytan

Patient Story (Frydman)

There is no patient story in this phase. At some point during the year, our patient’s employer will discuss provided health care coverage with a health plan or plan(s) who have set rates for coverage in the coming year. On the diagram, there’s no red dot indicating the presence of data because in many (most?) cases there is not a lot of data to guide this conversation. Many health plans have claims data, to show how many services and what types have been paid for throughout the year. They may not have data about the effectiveness of those services. For example, they may not know what percent of office visits for high blood pressure showed effective control. On the employers’ part, they may not have much data, either. If they are self-insured, they may have similar levels of claims data, but not measures of performance.

Even in health care organizations with advanced electronic medical records, the determination of “% patients with appropriate blood pressure control” may not be done in an automated fashion – a random selection of charts may be used to come up with this percentage. The electronic health record may facilitate the selection and review of charts, but nothing more. This is dependent on the health care environment being studied.

(If there are health plan and providers who would like to inform this part of the story, comments are open)

Clinical and Public Health pearls (Houston-Miller and Eytan)

  • High blood pressure is one of the most costly conditions for employers, more than cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and behavioral health conditions. This does not take into account that hypertension is responsible for a significant amount of morbidity among patients with heart disease and diabetes. This post shows the costs of each. The first graph shows the cost per person with the condition. When you average the costs across an entire employed population, the large numbers of patients with hypertension escalates the cost of this condition above all others. For those people interested in the cost profile of chronic conditions to employers, The Center for Studying Health System Change hosted a forum where expert Ron Goetzel, Ph.D. provided an updated look at the data. It is compelling.
  • Fewer than 10% of the cases of undetected or uncontrolled hypertension could be associated with lack of health care use. In other words, health plans and employers are already paying for this current state. It does not exist because patients are not getting enough health care.

Comment

Where is the data? and What’s Missing? In this case, there isn’t much data in the conversation. The conversation is around use of services, and in that setting, an assumption is typically made that more services is better. The result is that these stakeholders cannot engage at their potential to ensure that services are as effective as possible.

It is possible that a patient or provider may share data about the effectiveness of their blood pressure control services which are being purchased and paid for by employer and health plan respectively. Blood pressure control is already a HEDIS measure, and is a development Pay for Performance measure in California in 2009.

Next post, the yearly checkback, completing the cycle. Comments welcomed, of course

Moving Closer to Patient Centered Care in Yountville, California

July 30th, 2008 | Popularity: 46%
1 comment
Yountville

I think word has gotten out that I am something of an urban dweller; Susan Edgman-Levitan was nice enough to ask me, “Ted, are you hanging in there?” as we spent several days in Yountville, California at the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation forum on Achieving Patient-Centered care.

I ended up doing just fine – it’s about the content, not the place, and a scenic jog through the vineyards of Yountville can’t be argued with.

And the content was right up my alley, with thanks to the ABIM Foundation for hosting this discussion. The discussions at the Forum are being compiled by the ABIM Foundation, so I will let them report on that rather than me, but I can share my perceptions of the event here.

First of all, patients and families were involved throughout, as faculty and equal participants. This continues an important precedent in helping health care leaders achieve comfort with this idea.

One of the most powerful moments was Margaret Murphy sharing the story of her son Kevin’s death (You can read more about it here) within the Irish health system. I really appreciated Mrs. Murphy’s use of images in her storytelling – in the future, a presentation without at least 50 % images and a video or two is going to be minimum bar to go in front of an audience. There was discussion about Kevin’s death being the result of diagnostic error. I think that’s true, and I also think that if the family had access to all of his medical information from the beginning, it might have changed the diagnostic approach or caught the fatal series of errors before they happened.

For my part, I presented the following slides in the 10 minutes I had alotted, around the topic of the use of health information technology to put patients, families, and communities in the center of care.

Enjoy (I hope) and thanks to the ABIM Foundation for hosting this discussion and follow-up.

Click on any image to see them larger

Now Reading: A Few Peer-Reviewed Articles About Patient Willingness to Self-Monitor

July 20th, 2008 | Popularity: 52%
1 comment
Patients' experiences and opinions of home blood pressure measurement

Rickerby, J, and J Woodward. “Patients’ experiences and opinions of home blood pressure measurement.” J Hum Hypertens 17, no. 7 (0): 495-503.

Systematic Review of Home Telemonitoring for Chronic Diseases: The Evidence Base

Pare, Guy, Mirou Jaana, and Claude Sicotte. “Systematic Review of Home Telemonitoring for Chronic Diseases: The Evidence Base.” J Am Med Inform Assoc 14, no. 3 (May 1, 2007): 269-277

Comparison of acceptability of and preferences for different methods of measuring blood pressure in primary care

Little, Paul, Jane Barnett, Lucy Barnsley, Jean Marjoram, Alex Fitzgerald-Barron, and David Mant. “Comparison of acceptability of and preferences for different methods of measuring blood pressure in primary care.” BMJ 325, no. 7358 (August 3, 2002): 258-259.

Not pictured: Port, Kristjan, Kairit Palm, and Margus Viigimaa. “Daily usage and efficiency of remote home monitoring in hypertensive patients over a one-year period.” J Telemed Telecare 11, no. suppl_1 (July 1, 2005): 34-36.

There’s a potentially serious gap in the Connectivity for Californians initiative that we are addressing. Here’s a quote that illustrates it:

It is very clear from the interview data that patients have their own ideas, and spend a lot more time thinking about their BP than is apparent in the average 10-min consultation in general practice.

The gap is patient involvement in the design and planning of this initiative, or any healthcare initiative for that matter. Patients have many more ideas about what the problems are to be solved than can be gleaned even from articles like this – the articles simply show that the ideas are out there. Fortunately, we are committing ourselves to have a patient representative involved from the beginning, and that is coming together before any work is started.

The quote above is from the first paper by Rickerby, et. al (click on the images to the right to review any of the papers yourself), which described a qualitative study to look at a small number of patients’ attitudes toward monitoring their own blood pressure, in a practice that routinely recommends this.

The question (#1)

The reason I have reviewed these particular papers is because of the commonly posed question to me over the past several months, in the form of, “Ted, will/are patients really motivated to check their own blood pressure?” with the implication that they are not and they won’t. It’s a fair question that deserves an informed response. Several of the readers on this blog have given me some information from their own lives. These papers add to that knowledge.

The answer (#1)

They are and they will.

The question (#2)

This came up during reading of the papers. Does patient engagement come from having knowledge? Or does knowledge come from being engaged? This came up because patients in the first study who did not have knowledge about why they should monitor their blood pressure or how to do it seemed less engaged.

The answer (#2)

Unclear, with the implication being about whether to work to engage patients with more knowledge or use knowledge as a means test for engagement. I think regardless of the answer, there’s no reason not to provide information to patients. That answer is good enough in this case.

Read on for more conclusions….

» Read more: Now Reading: A Few Peer-Reviewed Articles About Patient Willingness to Self-Monitor

PCPCC Stakeholders Working Meeting – Misc Notes

July 16th, 2008 | Popularity: 28%
6 comments

(presentations online here)

Paul Grundy, MD – “Think huge”

Purchaser guide – there have been many of these, but the first time one prepared with consumers and providers

Health Information Technology – help educate, advocate, demonstrate around PCMH the technology that will be necessary to help physicians make the transformation

Panel – What Does it Cost to Become a Patient Centered Medical Home?

Bob Berenson, MD, Senior Fellow, The Urban Institute

“A good medical home”- patient with superficial phlebitis treated via one office visit, 6 phone calls, 6 e-mails, including hematologic consultation, one reimbursement for in-office care

Julia Pillsbury, DO, Alternate RUC Representative, American Academy of Pediatrics

New G codes for Medical Home-type work. Crosswalked to currently existing codes, some subsume current G codes, some do not. Tier 1, 2, and 3, between 6.5 to 9.2 minutes per patient per month, may be around $50/member/month.

Patient Partnership

Sabrina Corlette, Director of Health Policy, The National Partnership for Women and Families

Grant from the Wellpoint Foundation to introduce consumer advocates to PCMH and involve them and shaping it. Environmental scan, Focus Groups, Develop consumer/patient principles

Debbie Peikes, Ph.D., Mathematica Policy Research

We should involve patients and providers in primary care assignment, using claims retrospectively is expedient perhaps but has difficulties

Internet Holiday Complete; Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative Stakeholders Meeting

July 16th, 2008 | Popularity: 21%
1 comment

As the title says, my Internet holiday is complete. It was as fun as being in the cloud, to be sure. I’ll be back to regular publishing now, and comments and pings are turned back on.

PCPCC Meeting Washington DC

Patient Centered Primary Care Collaborative, Washington, DC

I’m resuming life in the cloud by attending the Patient Centered Primary Care Collaborative Stakeholders Working Meeting, here in Washington, DC. I hope to post updates throughout the day – we are all fortunate that this group operates with an impressive level of openness and interest in collaboration (just as its name implies). The agenda and materials are online for others to peruse.

By the way, here’s what an Internet Holiday looks like.

Internet Holiday


A patient's advice to hospital communicators | Article | Homepage articles

June 25th, 2008 | Popularity: 26%
1 comment

Businessweek's Cutting Edge of Health Care includes After Visit Summaries

June 23rd, 2008 | Popularity: 21%
0 comments | Leave a reply

Facts about the 2008 National Patient Safety Goals | Joint Commission

May 29th, 2008 | Popularity: 29%
0 comments | Leave a reply

NAHIT Releases HIT Definitions | News | Healthcare Informatics

May 28th, 2008 | Popularity: 25%
0 comments | Leave a reply

Questions Are the Answer – AHRQ

May 28th, 2008 | Popularity: 23%
0 comments | Leave a reply
  • Questions Are the Answer – AHRQ – Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality – supporting reduction of medical errors and accuracy – through patient involvement. Now the health system can meet patients half way by providing this information as part of every encounter.

More work understanding hypertension and Health 2.0 applications

May 16th, 2008 | Popularity: 36%
1 comment

The Patient is Still the Focus: 21st Century Family Medicine in Sebastopol, California

May 3rd, 2008 | Popularity: 40%
0 comments | Leave a reply

Earlier in my journey, when I visited technologically enabled practices in New York and Washington, DC, I wondered aloud to my project officer, Veenu Aulakh, MPH, from the California Healthcare Foundation, if California would also show itself to be a leader in 21st century medicine enabled by technology. There’s no question that systems like Sutter Health, Kaiser Permanente, and Sharp are national leaders – we were looking for leaders in smaller practices, where 90 % of Americans receive their health care.

Then we discovered Sebastopol Community Health Center, part of the Redwood Community Health Coalition.

I got to visit with Jason Cunningham, DO, the Medical Director and full spectrum family medicine specialist, in March, 2008, but I did not get to shadow him providing care. I wanted to come back, and so I did, this time with Veenu. Coming with Veenu also satisfied my desire to do some shadowing with our funders, because they can see things from a unique perspective. I was able to do the same with our New York funders, when Rachel Block shadowed with us in March. Veenu has an industrial engineering background, so she is not a stranger to shadowing or process improvement.

Jason and the staff gave us a warm welcome, and again it was like walking into the 21st Century (instead of the 19th). Not a single paper chart in sight. There was now an automated vitals machine. Care team coordinators (the role assigned to medical assistants in this model) were now using tablet computers to room patients. Jason and the team were further developing their electronic health record, manufactured by eClinicalWorks, to support a medical home practice.

First photographs – click on any to see larger size

To show the possibilities of collaboration in this new world, Jason informed us that he’s going to install the special build of the product known as “Take Care New York,” or TCNY, tuned for population management and with the experience of the entire Primary Care Information Project in New York city. In other words, California patients are going to benefit from an EHR that includes the experience of New York patients, seamlessly.

Proving the viability of a medical home, even in (especially in) the safety net

As space age as this practice looks, it is not funded predominantly through commercial insurance. Sebastopol Community Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center, with a funding stream tied strongly to in person visits. Despite this potential limitation, this health center is working to support visit-based AND non-visit based population care in a financially viable way. They are doing this by maintaining visit density, keeping overhead low, and providing team care coordinators with non-direct-patient care time to co-manage panels, assisted by an introspective EHR. Jason showed us how he can query his panel quickly to build exception reports and understand their health, right within the electronic health record. No separate registry is being used here, which means no interfacing and no double-entry of data.

The shadowing experience

We started the day with the team huddle, which was as futuristic as one would hope – each practitioner with a portable version of the electronic health record, reviewing the patients of the day and preparing for each individualized care experience. By now, Jason has discovered the best approach to using an electronic device in the exam room. Even though this site is described as an “alpha alpha” site, the technology seemed to melt into the background of the green rolling hills during the visit. This could be because the team are using low footprint tablet PCs in exam rooms. It’s also because the devices are used strategically for new vs. follow-up visits. The device is always positioned in patient view, with provider facing the patient.

I could also tell that in true continuous improvement fashion, little things have been changed and improved in the system over time. A new field here, a new way of communicating between the team about something here, an idea to use an exam room one way or another with the computers.

In between patients, I had a great conversation with Jenny, the Center’s Family Nurse Practitioner. She asked for my advice on how to document parts of the patient experience in the health record, and my best answer was to think about where the patient would expect it to be, every time, and put it there. We both agreed, I think, that one of the best things we can do as care providers is to treat a patients’ story with respect by recording it accurately, and making sure it is safely kept where it can be used to support ongoing care by anyone on the team, with all of the appropriate security controls, of course.

Teaching, for a lifetime

Because this medical center is prototyping the future workflow of the rest of the Coalition medical centers, there is always teaching going on of other providers. On this particular day, Harriett, the Care Team Coordinator (a Medical Assistant) was training a fellow Care Team Coordinator on the use of the system.

At one point during the day, Harriett came in for a short break during a very busy morning. I mentioned to her that I noticed that she has a very supportive teaching style. When there was a question, she would make sure that her student learned by doing – she was very good at not taking over the use of the computer, essentially empowering others to learn. A commitment to being an experimental medical center means a commitment to always teaching. I asked about this – how would it feel to be teaching every day for the next few years as the system rolled out, I asked? Her answer was, “This is for a lifetime.”

Fortunately for the Medical Center and her patients, Harriet has been accepted into the Physician Assistant program at University of California, Davis, and Jason has agreed to be her preceptor during her practical work.

I’m Still a Fan

Jason and his colleagues are pouring themselves into to this work, for the benefit of their patients and their community. As I said in March, I am hugely impressed with the initiative to provide the right care first and foremost, with an eye to finances, not the other way around.

» Read more: The Patient is Still the Focus: 21st Century Family Medicine in Sebastopol, California

What’s a Leader vs. a Manager?; GenY is Hard Working; New York PCIP Doing Well

April 11th, 2008 | Popularity: 83%
0 comments | Leave a reply

April 5th through April 8th:

Voicethread; Zotero; Nice Summary of Medical Home from Deloitte

April 3rd, 2008 | Popularity: 82%
0 comments | Leave a reply

April 1st through April 2nd:

More Health2.0 = iPhone2.0 – Apple Digital Fitness System; Larry Weed; EMC’s Hypertension Management Program; GHI+HIP = Medical Home

March 28th, 2008 | Popularity: 69%
0 comments | Leave a reply

A lot of stuff going on this week…

“Do you have time to show Ted our personal health record system?” – The system of patient and family centeredness at Medical College of Georgia

March 27th, 2008 | Popularity: 39%
1 comment

Imagine that you are going to launch a new program, like patient access to their medical record online, and a visitor from another institution asks for a tour of the work in progress. Then imagine that it isn’t a member of the staff that does the demo – it is one of your patients. I think this idea would sound foreign to most organizations. It’s pretty normal here, and Christine did a great job, on her own, without any oversight or hand holding. This is the level of trust that exists here.

Images, click any to see larger

I have actually never had a patient demonstrate their own access to the electronic health record to me. This was the first time in my career. I am so used to doing the demos and describing what patients want, and this was so different because it included the things that worked best, but also the hopes and dreams for using this tool to be involved in care. Christine not only did the demonstration for me, but also 3 Medical College of Georgia Students, and part of the research team on a funded project to introduce patient access into hypertension care.

In the hopes and dreams part, Christine talked about uses of the system that we might consider concerning as medical professionals, such as writing messages that conveyed a significant level of concern about her condition (she lives with MS), but when she explained it, it made sense, and it became not so concerning.

This was a theme throughout the visit – the normalcy of patient and family involvement in care. This was very evident in the 3W Neurosciences unit and Ambulatory clinic. Countertops are reduced or eliminated. The layout is open. There is no such thing as “visiting hours.” Signage is welcoming and participation is encouraged. There are alcoves for family conferences, and even computers set up for families to use. There is guest wireless throughout the hospital.

As you watch the Remaking of American Medicine show and look at the data associated with this tranformation, it’s very clear this is not only good for families and patients (and society), it’s good for business. Quality is up, mortality is down, patient satisfaction is up, profits are up – all the right trends for a hospital serving a vital population like this.

This organization of course is part of a health care system with many challenges – physicians and nurses have significant time challenges, and even the physicians in training here are at risk in terms of their future enjoyment of the profession. I casually ran my idea of a 4th year rotation on patient-centered care (which would include elements of LEAN such as process flow, physician leadership, and service and access methods) with our student hosts, and they provided a little balance to the concept and assistance with messaging. Matt, Kim, and Brandi reminded me about the immediate needs of physicians in training and the way that they learn about and commit to new training experiences. I’d therefore like to propose a rotation on success in practice beyond the diagnosis – enjoying work, life, and balancing both successfully. Being patient centered guarantees that this is the outcome for any physician, in my opinion.

The thing I am super interested whenever I meet people who have done exceptional things is, “Why?” I noticed that in the PBS show, Medical College of Georgia was an institution in which their transformation was not set off by a patient tragedy. So I asked Pat about this and here’s what she said:

What started this and kept it going and I may have told you this in a way is that we developed a value around the inclusion of the patients voice in our work from the beginning of the design process for the new childrens hospital. I personally was a senior executive back then and I was utterly transformed by the power of the patient’s (in this case, parents and children) perspective on what mattered most in care and I could see that this was a strength that we were denying ourselves as executive leadership. We also had very good mentors way back then in Bev Johnson and the Institute for Family Centered Care and I think we were just open to learning. Because I became so committed and over time could show the hard results in terms of outcomes so did the rest of our leadership. I think it is really that simple….just persistence over many years, Ted.

I think this is very remarkable – Pat and the Medical College of Georgia did not wait for a patient to be hurt to transform their system. I keep reading and hearing about organizations that transform only after a tragedy. We’re health care, we cannot wait for a tragedy, right?

When we were touring 3West, Pat, Roslyn, and Bernard showed me a plaque, signed by every staff member that represents their commitment to patient and family centered care. The first thing I did was look at the date that it was first signed, and of course wondered if it was up to date. As I did that Roslyn said, “Whenever we get new staff, they add their signatures, too. We haven’t had new staff in a long time, though, because people stay here.”

I can’t wait to see the innovation that will come from Medical College of Georgia in the launch of their patient access system. This will take Patient and Family Centered Care beyond their physical buildings and wherever patients and families live, work, and play.

With thanks again to the patients, families, staff, physician and leadership at MCG for being great teachers, so that every patient and family can be involved in their care, whether or not they are fortunate to be supported by the MCG Health System.

And, I am not going to consider patient access to their medical record successful until a patient does the demo.

Your Voice Video

March 11th, 2008 | Popularity: 30%
3 comments

This video was posted on the Mayo Clinic Health Policy Center Blog and includes the voices of people and their views on health care. There’s one in the middle that I found powerful. See if you agree.

I think more of the discussion should come from those receiving care in general, and I like that YouTube and Web2.0 in general is making that a reality.

There’s an associated slide presentation with data about patient access, and I liked the wording of the question, which was “Patients should be able to obtain accurate and complete information on their own health conditions so they can actively participate in making treatment decisions.” 79 percent said this was Very/Extremely important.

Hoshin and S.M.A.R.T. goals; What incentivizes Medical Schools; A CIO that embraces Web2.0 (I approve)

February 21st, 2008 | Popularity: 47%
0 comments | Leave a reply

February 18th through February 19th:

PHRs for migrant and seasonal workers, PHR Resource from AHIMA

December 13th, 2007 | Popularity: 10%
0 comments | Leave a reply

PCHIT links for December 6th through December 12th:

How to talk to a doctor (?), Indiana and Patient-Centered Care, Patients want EHRs

December 6th, 2007 | Popularity: 20%
0 comments | Leave a reply

PCHIT links for November 29th through December 4th: