Posts Tagged ‘e-patients’

When can patients have their data?

December 15th, 2009 | Popularity: 6%
12 comments

What a challenging conversation this can be.

Kudos and sincere thanks to the National Partnership for Women and Families and its hosted Consumer Partnership for eHealth for hosting the discussion entitled ““How Access to Information Can Empower Patients and their Caregivers” yesterday. It was the right place, right time, right group of people. I think we nearly split the atom.

e-Patient Dave in his post on e-patients.net did a nice job of summarizing the feeling on the part of the patients in the room, so I’ll just post what was going through my mind here.

After showing the images that I previously posted on this blog (you can see them here), a question was asked about sharing of lab results, imaging results, physician notes, and the like.

As you can see from Dave’s review of things, there appeared to be a difference of opinion about “when.”

The problem I see with the response of “yes, they should have their results; however…” or “yes they should see their data, but…” is that it reminds me of so many conversations I have had that go something like this:

“Ted, minorities (such as yourself) should have equal rights, no question about that. Just not now.”

That’s the reality I have lived, and I think for someone who is struggling to be respected in our health care system, this is how responses like the above can come across, as Dave’s blog post shows. This is why I turned to Dave and Regina and asked them to provide their personal experience, which they did, and very passionately so.

Instead of wondering,”Should the doctor see the results first?” let’s ask a deeper question: “When can patients have their data?” And…in more and more health systems, the answer is “whenever they want it,” with off-the-charts satisfaction on the part of patients and clinicians.

Yesterday really helped me understand that this is not going to be an easy conversation, however, I’m happy to participate in it, and invite the patient to be in the room while it is happening.

Why? Because I may have gone to medical school, but I have not yet had stage 4 metastatic renal carcinoma or cared for someone who has.

Electronic health records raise doubt – The Boston Globe

April 13th, 2009 | Popularity: 14%
0 comments | Leave a reply

Electronic health records raise doubt – The Boston Globe – Our very own e-patient Dave is profiled in the Boston Globe about his experience porting records to Google Health. The experience demonstrates the importance of accuracy as close to the patient-physician interaction as possible.

The story has apparently now been elevated to a full blown crisis by ZDNet.

Interactive Map: Media Sources With No Financial Ties (Add yourself)

December 19th, 2008 | Popularity: 25%
4 comments

I have been wanting to do something interesting with maps for awhile, and I thought a map of available media sources with no financial ties was as good a reason as any, so I created this one for people to identify themselves as individuals without financial ties to device or drug manufacturers for at least 5 years.

This is based on the following posts on my blog and on e-patients.net. Feel free to read those for more background.

“No financial ties” is defined as “I do not have any financial interest or ties to, and have not received any honoraria from, pharmaceutical or device manufacturers.”

To add your name/location, just hit the “Add” button in the map above. Provide whatever information you would like. Your address will not be shown, just your location. As an example here’s my entry: Ted Eytan.

If you’d like to go to the map directly and add yourself there, the link is here.

Feedback and comments welcomed.

e-patients: New York Times Health Section

October 4th, 2008 | Popularity: 15%
3 comments

e-patients: New York Times Health Section

Read the comments and watch how patients lean and teach each other about how they can thrive in our health care system, and how we can perform better for them. This is a revolution.

I’m not disfigured from it but I learned my lesson: do not tolerate professionals who think we shouldn’t be privy to our medical data, much less the chance that we might have something to contribute. But we do.

e-patients: Participate in defining “Health 2.0″

May 7th, 2008 | Popularity: 29%
8 comments

Over at one of my favorite blogs, e-patients.net, e-Patient Dave is starting a dicussion about what Health 2.0 “is;”: e-patients: Participate in defining “Health 2.0″

I started things off with a definition based on one created by The Economist, which I’ll repeat here:

Health 2.0 is the transition to personal, participatory health care. Everyone is invited to see what is happening in their own care and in the health care system in general, to add their ideas, and to make it better every day.

Feel free to suggest your improvements here, or there. I enjoy the idea that patients like Dave and readers of e-Patients will create improvements that can be incorporated.

If someone asked you, “What is Health 2.0?” Would you feel comfortable answering with the definition above? If not, how would you change it? Be sure if you would to tell a little bit about “why?” The story of how we get here is as important as the where we got to.