- CCHIT Letter and Analysis regarding Meaningful Use – CCHIT tags and analyzes current meaningful use matrix against current certification criteria. The organization appears poised to certify EHR's for ability to provide patient access to aspects of their medical record. See what you think.
Posts Tagged ‘CCHIT’
CCHIT Letter and Analysis regarding Meaningful Use
August 13th, 2009 | Popularity: 2% 0 comments | Leave a replyCCHIT Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology – Annotated Meaningful Use Matrix
July 10th, 2009 | Popularity: 4% 1 comment- Presentations from past events – CCHIT Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology – Annotated Meaningful Use Matrix – CCHIT has taken the meaningful use matrix developed by the HIT Policy Committee and annotated it with current and future requirements for EHRs and PHRs. The good news is that annotations are generally favorable (in terms of doability) of the patient and family engagement section.
Juhan’s HealthCard
December 17th, 2008 | Popularity: 33% 6 comments
Juhan’s HealthCard, originally uploaded by juhansonin.
I serve with Juhan Sonin on the CCHIT Personal Health Records Workgroup. Juhan is an expert in usability and design of personal health services (compared to myself, for sure) and is helping the group understand the potential for certifying for usability of personal health record services.
Juhan notes that he uses his own personal health informaiton in his designs, so I wanted to confirm that it was okay to repost here. Confirmation is below. It can be easier than it is today to know the health status of a person, yes? See what you think.
Thanks; I use the HealthCard during EVERY nurse/doc/hospital/insurance transaction. Amazing reactions from ppl.
Anything I post = public and abusable.
All should be CC licensed.HACK and ABUSE at will.
Thanks Ted,
JuhanNifty wallet card by the way. May I post to my blog (I assume yes, since it’s on Flickr..)?
Ted
CCHIT awaits word on fate in Obama administration – Modern Healthcare
November 22nd, 2008 | Popularity: 10% 0 comments | Leave a reply- CCHIT awaits word on fate in Obama administration – Modern Healthcare – Interesting commentary about CCHIT's future prospects.
Public Comment – CCHIT Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology
September 29th, 2008 | Popularity: 20% 0 comments | Leave a replyWelcome to the very first public comment period for Personal Health Records draft criteria for certification:
Public Comment – CCHIT Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology
There is an introductory document that accompanies the PHR criteria that I encourage all commenters to read.
In getting to this point, I was trying to remember why I applied to be a part of this first workgroup, because I was initially skeptical about its utility. That changed when I saw the Advisory Task Force recommendations, and when I reflected on my first year of service, in the Foundations Workgroup.
The great thing about serving on this group for me was listening to a diversity of experience and role in health care and personal health records. I learned that personal health records can be more than a supplement to the patient-physician relationship – they can support health in a variety of situations. I wrote about their value in emergency situations previously, which is something I really didn’t envision in my previous work.
I also learned that some of the dreams we have had for personal health records, that they could integrate information from multiple sources, and be controllable and manageable by patients could come true. This would require that we decide what the most important building blocks are, and create an environment where experts across organizations could share best practices and create a 3-5 year vision for products, rather than a 6 month – 1 year vision, which sometimes happens within individual organizations. I think this is what CCHIT is supporting in its leadership.
The public comment period is intended to get us there, because the criteria are still draft. See what you think and thanks for your comments about the criteria (on the CCHIT Website, please).
(CCHIT): An Invitation to Participate in Developing a Certification Program for Personal Health Records
September 16th, 2008 | Popularity: 16% 8 commentsI am posting this invitation from the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology in its entirety, because I am Co-Chair of the Personal Health Records Workgroup alongside Lory Wood from the Good Health Network. I’ve been very impressed with the experience and talent that the group has brought to this first step and I have learned a ton. The input of the public is the next step. I encourage everyone to get involved.
___
If you are thinking about using a personal health record (PHR) to better manage personal health but aren’t sure what you should look for, you may be asking questions such as these:
§ With PHRs offered by physicians, health insurers or online providers, how do I begin to make a choice that is right for me or my family?
§ Everyone is worrying about electronic data and privacy today, so how can I be sure that the PHR I choose has adequate security?
§ Will I be able to share access to my personal health information with those I trust such as my doctor or an emergency department?
There is a program developing to help you answer these questions. The Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology (CCHIT®) is an officially “recognized certification body” in the US for health information technology – a private, nonprofit organization that is to electronic health information products what Underwriters Laboratories is to electrical products. The Commission applies standards, tests products, and awards a “seal of compliance” to health information products. If you buy an electrical product, you should expect to see the UL® seal. If you choose a health information product, you should look for the CCHIT certification seal.
The Certification Commission already certifies electronic health records used in doctor’s offices and hospitals. The Commission will launch a new program for personal health records in mid-2009 that will emphasize privacy, security and the information sharing capabilities of PHRs.
The Commission has completed its first step, the creation of draft criteria for testing PHRs. Beginning Monday, Sept. 29, the criteria will be posted to http://cchit.org/participate/public-comment/ and available for a 30-day public comment period.
A new Web site and blog dedicated to furthering the conversation about PHRs, www.phrdecisions.com, will launch on that same date. A consumer’s guide to certification of PHRs will also be available there.
On Friday, Oct. 10, the Certification Commission will host a special free Town Call teleconference that will allow consumers and consumer representatives to gain a better understanding of PHR certification and how they can play a role in the process. The Town Call will include a presentation by Dr. Mark Leavitt, chair of the Commission, and Dr. Jodi Pettit, the staff leader of the PHR Work Group. It can be downloaded by Oct. 9 at www.phrdecisions.com.
Participants in the Town Call can ask questions during the call or online at www.phrdecisions.com. The questions and answers will be posted online following the teleconference.
The dial-in information for the Town Call is:
4:00 pm ET/ 3:00 pm CT/ 2:00 pm MT/ 1:00 pm PT
Participant Dial-In Number: 1 (877) 313-5342
Conference ID Number: 65204557
Thinking about Personal Health Records beyond the health care system
September 4th, 2008 | Popularity: 25% 4 commentsUpdated 9/10/08: Broken link below fixed (the one that went here).
As I have mentioned previously on this blog, and as is mentioned on the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology Website, I am Co-chair of CCHIT’s first Workgroup covering Personal Health Records this year, along with Lory Wood from the Good Health Network.
As you can tell from the list of members on the workgroup , the expertise represented is very impressive in its breadth, and its national scope, and we have all been working hard to support the first certification process for Personal Health Records in 2009. I encourage anyone interested in PHR Certification to follow its course through CCHIT communications on its web site and other venues; I won’t be discussing specifics of certification here.
What I am writing about is how this process is changing my understanding of the role of personal health records beyond the health system.
A great example is in the case of emergency responders – I recently posted my experience being one. Earlier this year, I commented on the value of a personal health record in another incident I was a part of, and it is interesting for me to look at what I said., which was around the value of a personal health record in preventing emergencies by promoting better patient engagement around their therapies. I still believe in that.
While that’s waiting to happen though, what about the times when an employee might have an emergency at the worksite or a person might suffer a car crash or other incident while traveling? It’s possible that in the incident I responded to earlier this year that the result would be a report back to family that their mother/father/daughter/son/brother/sister had died while co-workers and responders were frantically working to assess their medical condition.
Imagine what it might be like for an employee in a large big-box retailer to be able to identify parts of their medical history to be made available on an emergency basis to their employer, especially if the worksite is large enough that their personal effects are typically very far from where they work. Many of us fill out emergency contact information when we complete new-employment paperwork. Usually this is a piece of paper, and in most cases provides a thin buffer of hope that critical information about us will be available if it’s needed at a worksite emergency.
The same goes for automobile crashes, because a vehicle identification number by itself is often not enough to positively identify a crash victim or provide relevant medical information at a critical time of need. Several states (Florida and Ohio) and the automotive industry have thought about this. As Larry Williams explained to me, manufacturers have thought about the car ownership experience and their desire to provide support at its lowest point by providing methods for consumers to connect identification and emergency contact information to their vehicle IDs. The innovation in health care that comes from industries who are built on serving consumers primarily is interesting, isn’t it.
Both the American Health Information Community and IHE have produced a use case and white paper respectively, relevant to the potential role of a personal health record beyond a tethered connection to a primary care provider, that describe an ability for a person to tie their medical history to their vehicle’s identification number, for positive identification and medical attention. This is where a personal health record might integrate, at the discretion of the consumer.
All of this presumes appropriate privacy protections, of course, such that linkage and management of the information is under the control of the consumer.
This thinking is reinforcing in me the idea that a patient’s medical home is really the place where they live, work, and play. The promise of the personal health record is that people can leverage their personal health information at the right place and time to be enabled to do what’s most important to them, while being supported by a broad diversity of care providers, who at any given time are nurses, doctors, co-workers, emergency responders, families, and communities. This is a good thing to learn.
Health Affairs Blog: Mark Leavitt “not magical just practical”
August 22nd, 2008 | Popularity: 27% 0 comments | Leave a replyHealth Affairs Blog: Health IT Initiatives: Not Magical, Just Practical
Thoughtful quasi-blogpost* from Mark Leavitt, MD, who is also the Chair of the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT). In the post, Mark very nicely acknolwedges the number of dedicated volunteers in the CCHIT process – I know from experience that this group is working hard and is very talented (way more than I am).
*the quasi part is that I notice that the Health Affairs blog appears (to me anyway) as more of a Web 1.0 publication with comments, than a blog in the spirit of blogs. It might be nice to tweak the HTML title tags a bit for easier embedding into other blogs, and maybe shorter, more personal posts, in the spirit of blogging. I think Health Affairs has been on the leading edge to adopt the blog format in the first place to be sure, now perhaps they could go a little farther to support interaction with the people in health policy in a more behind the curtain way…
CHAPTER 305 OF THE ACTS OF 2008: Massachusetts
August 20th, 2008 | Popularity: 22% 2 comments- CHAPTER 305 OF THE ACTS OF 2008: Massachusetts – Section 37 is a powerful section. Could they follow-up with legislation requiring that patients have access to this information online as well? The role of CCHIT "or successor organization" is codified as well.
Personal Health Record PHR Advisory Task Force – There’s now a position for a patient.
June 23rd, 2008 | Popularity: 20% 0 comments | Leave a replyMinutes from the first two meetings are also on this page. I believe the discussion regarding patient involvement happened after these meetings happened (at least, it is not in the minutes posted)
Health Management Rx: Good News/Bad News – CCHIT To Certify PHRs
June 23rd, 2008 | Popularity: 17% 0 comments | Leave a reply- Health Management Rx: Good News/Bad News – CCHIT To Certify PHRs – Helpful guidance as PHRs enters the realm of CCHIT
CCHIT Goes After PHRs « Chilmark Research
June 17th, 2008 | Popularity: 17% 0 comments | Leave a reply- CCHIT Goes After PHRs « Chilmark Research – commentary on PHR certification process
Serving on the Personal Health Records Work Group – Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology
June 10th, 2008 | Popularity: 21% 10 commentsThe members of Personal Health Records PHR Work Group Members – CCHIT Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology were announced today, click on the link to see the list.
It’s a pretty impressive group, myself excluded
, and I look forward to participating. Because CCHIT handles proprietary information, I won’t be blogging about my volunteer position with this group here.
CCHIT operates its own web site which includes opportunities for public commentary, and it also operates the EHRDecisions Blog, which I subscribe to.
AMA on NPR; Patients judge quality by presence of an EHR; CCHIT Expansion Plans for 2009
April 5th, 2008 | Popularity: 82% 0 comments | Leave a reply- Topics – e-Visits @ TransforMED – Transforming Medical Practices – Article on whether the tipping point has been reached for e-visits
- WordPress Plugin: SIMILE Timeline at freshlabs journal – Nice visualization tool
- Doctor-Patient ‘Web Visits’ Spur Privacy Concerns : NPR – Should the American Medical Association always present the contrarian view around patient access? I don’t agree with the implication that cell phone / telephone is “most secure.” Anyone who has been in an airport recently would probably agree.
- WSJ.com/Harris Interactive Study Asks: Are There Fair and Reliable Ways to Assess Healthcare Quality? – Patients are saying that having an EHR is a “fair” assessment of quality
- Expansion of CCHIT Certification for 2009 (PDF Presentation) – Overview of CCHIT’s work to date and future strategy. Disclaimer: I am on the Foundations Workgroup
- Meet the Press — Robert Scoble — The Blogosphere | Fast Company – How Tim Ferriss used the blogosphere to his advantage
- News – Diversity gap found among state’s doctors – sacbee.com – “Not just a civil rights issue, a public health issue”
- YouTube – Microsoft Surface Parody – Why not use the device the size of a small car? The peril and promise of on demand video in shaping your message.