<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ted Eytan, MD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tedeytan.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tedeytan.com</link>
	<description>e-Health. Patient empowerment. Washington, DC.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:10:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Photo Friday: We are all Patients in the End (Wonderful what can be done with a paintbrush) by SusannahFox</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/03/13/5036/comment-page-1#comment-7375</link>
		<dc:creator>SusannahFox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/03/13/5036#comment-7375</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Photo Friday: We are all Patients in the End by @tedeytan http://bit.ly/9SOcxl @reginaholliday @cindythroop&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Photo Friday: We are all Patients in the End by @tedeytan <a href="http://bit.ly/9SOcxl" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9SOcxl</a> @reginaholliday @cindythroop</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Photo Friday: We are all Patients in the End (Wonderful what can be done with a paintbrush) by Susannah Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/03/13/5036/comment-page-1#comment-7374</link>
		<dc:creator>Susannah Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/03/13/5036#comment-7374</guid>
		<description>Thank you!  I was just thinking about how my work as a survey researcher (and sometime ethnographer) is a bit like painting. I talk quite a bit about capturing &quot;portraits&quot; of the population, but my paintbrush is broad -- I paint with numbers, talking about people in the aggregate most of the time. When I do get a chance to bring it down to an individual level, it&#039;s esp. satisfying because that&#039;s where the storytelling can become personal. It&#039;s not &quot;61% of adults&quot; but this one person telling what happened to them and how it relates to the point I&#039;m making with the data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!  I was just thinking about how my work as a survey researcher (and sometime ethnographer) is a bit like painting. I talk quite a bit about capturing &#8220;portraits&#8221; of the population, but my paintbrush is broad &#8212; I paint with numbers, talking about people in the aggregate most of the time. When I do get a chance to bring it down to an individual level, it&#8217;s esp. satisfying because that&#8217;s where the storytelling can become personal. It&#8217;s not &#8220;61% of adults&#8221; but this one person telling what happened to them and how it relates to the point I&#8217;m making with the data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Now Reading: Health Care Law Blog: AHLA Connections: Legal Implications of Health Care Social Media by Luis Saldana</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/03/10/5024/comment-page-1#comment-7362</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Saldana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/?p=5024#comment-7362</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @TopsyRT: Now Reading: Health Care Law Blog: AHLA Connections: Legal Implications of Health Care Social Media http://bit.ly/dmFOq0&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @TopsyRT: Now Reading: Health Care Law Blog: AHLA Connections: Legal Implications of Health Care Social Media <a href="http://bit.ly/dmFOq0" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dmFOq0</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Now Reading: Health Care Law Blog: AHLA Connections: Legal Implications of Health Care Social Media by amednews</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/03/10/5024/comment-page-1#comment-7359</link>
		<dc:creator>amednews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/?p=5024#comment-7359</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @tedeytan
  
@bobcoffield Thanks for the great piece on legal issues in health care social media! http://bit.ly/dmFOq0&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @tedeytan</p>
<p>@bobcoffield Thanks for the great piece on legal issues in health care social media! <a href="http://bit.ly/dmFOq0" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dmFOq0</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Love wins: Gay marriage in Washington DC / The Christian Science Monitor &#8211; CSMonitor.com by Ted Eytan</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/03/08/5005/comment-page-1#comment-7349</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Eytan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/?p=5005#comment-7349</guid>
		<description>Miranda,

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattdunn/sets/72157623548113544/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Look at how happy these couples are.&lt;/a&gt; Their happiness is our happiness,

Ted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miranda,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattdunn/sets/72157623548113544/" rel="nofollow">Look at how happy these couples are.</a> Their happiness is our happiness,</p>
<p>Ted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Love wins: Gay marriage in Washington DC / The Christian Science Monitor &#8211; CSMonitor.com by Miranda Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/03/08/5005/comment-page-1#comment-7348</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/?p=5005#comment-7348</guid>
		<description>Same sex marriage?  Sad, just sad.  As if DC couldn&#039;t get any lower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same sex marriage?  Sad, just sad.  As if DC couldn&#8217;t get any lower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Now Reading: &#8220;Texting and Other E-Tools to Manage Chronic Disease&#8221; and &#8220;Health via Cell Phone in Mexico&#8221; by Alan Pitt, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/19/4742/comment-page-1#comment-7342</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Pitt, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/19/4742#comment-7342</guid>
		<description>Mr. Saucedo (Rodrigo) and Ted

Thanks for the interesting blog and comments.  I am an informatics physician at the Barrow Institute in Phoenix.  Somewhat bizarrely, I was aksed to comment on an evolving partnershpi wee have between our institute and the Slim Foundation several weeks ago.  There is interst in leveraging telehealth solutions  to provide neurorsurgical domain expertise with others in Mexico, but notably the foundation wants to broadly impact the many, not just the few.

My particular focus is patient enablement, how one allows the base of the health pyramid- afterall, there is limitless power if the patient can contribute to their own wellness.  Sadly, current efforts are largely focused on the provider- better EMR, rather than better patient diaries.  All of these methodolies need to be outcomes based as well.

For me, technology needs to be agnostic to the patient.  The front end needs to be something the patient is comfortable with...text, email, snail mail, TV...whatever the patient is comfortable engaging, but the backend needs to monitor, message and aggregate this information.  The solution also should incoprorate more than the patient and their direct provider.  In particular, there is value in engaging the family and others in the patient&#039;s wellness.  For example, juvenile patients with diabetes often view parental involvement as an intrusion, but the parent is worried.  The system needs to reach out to the parent when the child is in need of help with alerts.

I am working with a different group of companies than the ones you called out (MSFT, Google, Cisco) in the PHR space as well as connectivity.  My sense is our paths are going to converge soon.

Again, thank you for the comments

Alan Pitt, M.D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Saucedo (Rodrigo) and Ted</p>
<p>Thanks for the interesting blog and comments.  I am an informatics physician at the Barrow Institute in Phoenix.  Somewhat bizarrely, I was aksed to comment on an evolving partnershpi wee have between our institute and the Slim Foundation several weeks ago.  There is interst in leveraging telehealth solutions  to provide neurorsurgical domain expertise with others in Mexico, but notably the foundation wants to broadly impact the many, not just the few.</p>
<p>My particular focus is patient enablement, how one allows the base of the health pyramid- afterall, there is limitless power if the patient can contribute to their own wellness.  Sadly, current efforts are largely focused on the provider- better EMR, rather than better patient diaries.  All of these methodolies need to be outcomes based as well.</p>
<p>For me, technology needs to be agnostic to the patient.  The front end needs to be something the patient is comfortable with&#8230;text, email, snail mail, TV&#8230;whatever the patient is comfortable engaging, but the backend needs to monitor, message and aggregate this information.  The solution also should incoprorate more than the patient and their direct provider.  In particular, there is value in engaging the family and others in the patient&#8217;s wellness.  For example, juvenile patients with diabetes often view parental involvement as an intrusion, but the parent is worried.  The system needs to reach out to the parent when the child is in need of help with alerts.</p>
<p>I am working with a different group of companies than the ones you called out (MSFT, Google, Cisco) in the PHR space as well as connectivity.  My sense is our paths are going to converge soon.</p>
<p>Again, thank you for the comments</p>
<p>Alan Pitt, M.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Photo Friday: Picturing Health 2.0 &#8211; Dave and Kate by e-Patient Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/03/06/4933/comment-page-1#comment-7335</link>
		<dc:creator>e-Patient Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 13:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/03/06/4933#comment-7335</guid>
		<description>Ted, you nailed it again.  As I prepare for my first hands-on participation in a healthcare design exercise, as a &quot;voice of the customer&quot; in Beth Israel&#039;s Lean retreat this week, my homework has taught me how simple but vital it is to involve the customer, asking &quot;What does s/he want? What would be of service to them?&quot;

And now in a sense I see you, and Kaiser, and Beth Israel, and all of healthcare as &lt;i&gt;my&lt;/i&gt; customer. Because if &lt;i&gt;I&#039;m&lt;/i&gt; to be valuable in this process, I must ask what would be of service to all of &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt;.

So let me ask: what do you want? How can I, and we the patients, and we the Society for Participatory Medicine, serve you in achieving your goals?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted, you nailed it again.  As I prepare for my first hands-on participation in a healthcare design exercise, as a &#8220;voice of the customer&#8221; in Beth Israel&#8217;s Lean retreat this week, my homework has taught me how simple but vital it is to involve the customer, asking &#8220;What does s/he want? What would be of service to them?&#8221;</p>
<p>And now in a sense I see you, and Kaiser, and Beth Israel, and all of healthcare as <i>my</i> customer. Because if <i>I&#8217;m</i> to be valuable in this process, I must ask what would be of service to all of <i>you</i>.</p>
<p>So let me ask: what do you want? How can I, and we the patients, and we the Society for Participatory Medicine, serve you in achieving your goals?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Health 2.0 Definition : Not just the Latest, The Greatest! by The Health 2.0 Definition &#171; mHealth News Summary</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2008/06/13/1089/comment-page-1#comment-7300</link>
		<dc:creator>The Health 2.0 Definition &#171; mHealth News Summary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 08:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/2008/06/13/1089#comment-7300</guid>
		<description>[...] Full text: The Health 2.0 Definition : Not just the Latest, The Greatest! &#124; Ted Eytan, MD. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Full text: The Health 2.0 Definition : Not just the Latest, The Greatest! | Ted Eytan, MD. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Now Reading: &#8220;Texting and Other E-Tools to Manage Chronic Disease&#8221; and &#8220;Health via Cell Phone in Mexico&#8221; by “Texting and Other E-Tools to Manage Chronic Disease” and “Health via Cell Phone in Mexico” &#124; Ted Eytan, MD &#171; mHealth News Summary</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/19/4742/comment-page-1#comment-7294</link>
		<dc:creator>“Texting and Other E-Tools to Manage Chronic Disease” and “Health via Cell Phone in Mexico” &#124; Ted Eytan, MD &#171; mHealth News Summary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 06:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/19/4742#comment-7294</guid>
		<description>[...] Full Article: Now Reading: “Texting and Other E-Tools to Manage Chronic Disease” and “Health via Cell Phone .... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Full Article: Now Reading: “Texting and Other E-Tools to Manage Chronic Disease” and “Health via Cell Phone &#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 6 Reasons why mHealth is different than eHealth by 6 Reasons why mHealth is different than eHealth &#171; mHealth News Summary</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/18/4731/comment-page-1#comment-7293</link>
		<dc:creator>6 Reasons why mHealth is different than eHealth &#171; mHealth News Summary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 06:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/19/4731#comment-7293</guid>
		<description>[...] Full article: 6 Reasons why mHealth is different than eHealth &#124; Ted Eytan, MD. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Full article: 6 Reasons why mHealth is different than eHealth | Ted Eytan, MD. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 6 Reasons why mHealth is different than eHealth by Jeff Benabio</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/18/4731/comment-page-1#comment-7290</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Benabio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 03:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/19/4731#comment-7290</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;6 Reasons why mHealth is different than eHealth http://bit.ly/9eiQ7j via @tedeytan&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">6 Reasons why mHealth is different than eHealth <a href="http://bit.ly/9eiQ7j" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9eiQ7j</a> via @tedeytan</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Now Reading: &#8220;Texting and Other E-Tools to Manage Chronic Disease&#8221; and &#8220;Health via Cell Phone in Mexico&#8221; by Ted Eytan</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/19/4742/comment-page-1#comment-7279</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Eytan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/19/4742#comment-7279</guid>
		<description>Dear Rodrigo,

Well thank you for taking the time as expert-in-residence to add information from your experience. I and others are obviously impressed with the possibilities you are starting to make real.

I&#039;d be happy to talk more and to share information here about that, and refer people to learn more about your work; as I said in a previous post, there&#039;s a lot we can learn,

Ted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Rodrigo,</p>
<p>Well thank you for taking the time as expert-in-residence to add information from your experience. I and others are obviously impressed with the possibilities you are starting to make real.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be happy to talk more and to share information here about that, and refer people to learn more about your work; as I said in a previous post, there&#8217;s a lot we can learn,</p>
<p>Ted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Now Reading: &#8220;Texting and Other E-Tools to Manage Chronic Disease&#8221; and &#8220;Health via Cell Phone in Mexico&#8221; by Rodrigo Saucedo</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/19/4742/comment-page-1#comment-7278</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodrigo Saucedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/19/4742#comment-7278</guid>
		<description>Dear Ted, 

This is Rodrigo Saucedo from the Carlos Slim Health Institute. In your last entry, you presented six differences between mHealth and eHealth. One of them, which I particularly agree with, is Dentzer&#039;s vision that the forefront of mHealth is in the developing countries, out of which Mexico is one of them. 

Regretably, this comment overestimates the impact of mHealth in Mexico as mHealth solutions are not part of public policies yet; the Carlos Slim Health Institute, through strategic partnerships, has done the development and operation of these solutions. Our concept is based on the idea that the solutions must be directed to the end-user if a solution is to succeed. For that to be a reality, we have associated with Voxiva, one of the largest global health technology providers, and América Móvil, leader in the provision of mobile services, to develop a technological platform in which the internet, the mobile phone and the fixed phone interact.

We are scaling these solutions through public-private partnerships: Johnson&amp;Johnson, West Wireless Health Institute, Qualcomm and Jumex (one of the Mexican leaders in the beverage industry) and state and municipal governments.

We have focused our solutions in three major public health problems with which governments and the population are struggling with: 
- First, chronic diseases. We have developed a solution focused in changes in lifestyle and cardiovascular risk factors; we also developed a solution to promote self-management for those with diabetes, and we are developing a second solution focused in weight control and healthy nutrition. 
- Second, maternal and child health. We are working in the development of a solution for pregnant women with continuous interaction through the mobile phone; a solution for primary healthcare workers with an real-time application that has interaction for both the mobile phone and the internet; for those with high risk pregnancies we are working on an interactive home-care health system; finally, once the mom delivers, a solution focused on monitoring the baby&#039;s health evolution with an electronic vaccination schedule. 
- Finally, we have developed a solution for those with HIV/AIDS to provide a self-management tool with special focus in emotional health and adherence to the therapy.

For these solutions to become a public policy we need evidence through rigorous evaluations. We are now in the process of doing them. 

I&#039;d like to have a further talk with you should you consider it convenient.


Cheers, 

Rodrigo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Ted, </p>
<p>This is Rodrigo Saucedo from the Carlos Slim Health Institute. In your last entry, you presented six differences between mHealth and eHealth. One of them, which I particularly agree with, is Dentzer&#8217;s vision that the forefront of mHealth is in the developing countries, out of which Mexico is one of them. </p>
<p>Regretably, this comment overestimates the impact of mHealth in Mexico as mHealth solutions are not part of public policies yet; the Carlos Slim Health Institute, through strategic partnerships, has done the development and operation of these solutions. Our concept is based on the idea that the solutions must be directed to the end-user if a solution is to succeed. For that to be a reality, we have associated with Voxiva, one of the largest global health technology providers, and América Móvil, leader in the provision of mobile services, to develop a technological platform in which the internet, the mobile phone and the fixed phone interact.</p>
<p>We are scaling these solutions through public-private partnerships: Johnson&amp;Johnson, West Wireless Health Institute, Qualcomm and Jumex (one of the Mexican leaders in the beverage industry) and state and municipal governments.</p>
<p>We have focused our solutions in three major public health problems with which governments and the population are struggling with:<br />
- First, chronic diseases. We have developed a solution focused in changes in lifestyle and cardiovascular risk factors; we also developed a solution to promote self-management for those with diabetes, and we are developing a second solution focused in weight control and healthy nutrition.<br />
- Second, maternal and child health. We are working in the development of a solution for pregnant women with continuous interaction through the mobile phone; a solution for primary healthcare workers with an real-time application that has interaction for both the mobile phone and the internet; for those with high risk pregnancies we are working on an interactive home-care health system; finally, once the mom delivers, a solution focused on monitoring the baby&#8217;s health evolution with an electronic vaccination schedule.<br />
- Finally, we have developed a solution for those with HIV/AIDS to provide a self-management tool with special focus in emotional health and adherence to the therapy.</p>
<p>For these solutions to become a public policy we need evidence through rigorous evaluations. We are now in the process of doing them. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to have a further talk with you should you consider it convenient.</p>
<p>Cheers, </p>
<p>Rodrigo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 6 Reasons why mHealth is different than eHealth by Eric Topol and Wireless Medicine &#124; socialibrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/18/4731/comment-page-1#comment-7259</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Topol and Wireless Medicine &#124; socialibrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/19/4731#comment-7259</guid>
		<description>[...] Wireless health is linked to, but not the same as, mobile health. When we talk about &#8216;mHealth&#8217;, it may have to do more with developing countries and delivering services via mobile phones, than it does with transmitting vital signs and other &#8220;physiological metrics,&#8221; as Topol calls them, to an iPhone. (For more on the varying shades of m, e, and other &#8216;healths&#8217;, see this excellent blog post). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wireless health is linked to, but not the same as, mobile health. When we talk about &#8216;mHealth&#8217;, it may have to do more with developing countries and delivering services via mobile phones, than it does with transmitting vital signs and other &#8220;physiological metrics,&#8221; as Topol calls them, to an iPhone. (For more on the varying shades of m, e, and other &#8216;healths&#8217;, see this excellent blog post). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 6 Reasons why mHealth is different than eHealth by Science Report &#124; Biology News, Economics News, Computer Science News, Mathematics News, Physics News, Psychology News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Xbox, Wireless Technologies and Search Engines in Medicine 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/18/4731/comment-page-1#comment-7258</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Report &#124; Biology News, Economics News, Computer Science News, Mathematics News, Physics News, Psychology News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Xbox, Wireless Technologies and Search Engines in Medicine 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/19/4731#comment-7258</guid>
		<description>[...] 6 Reasons why mHealth is different than eHealth (Ted Eytan, MD) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 6 Reasons why mHealth is different than eHealth (Ted Eytan, MD) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 6 Reasons why mHealth is different than eHealth by George King</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/18/4731/comment-page-1#comment-7241</link>
		<dc:creator>George King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/19/4731#comment-7241</guid>
		<description>Goolgle would agree with #6 !!!  They will now code all applications for Mobibe before coding for PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goolgle would agree with #6 !!!  They will now code all applications for Mobibe before coding for PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Help Stanford Medical School teach EHR Etiquette to students by Gerard Livaudais</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/22/4801/comment-page-1#comment-7238</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard Livaudais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/22/4801#comment-7238</guid>
		<description>Hi Ted,
Just some random thoughts as i reflected on my own experience with pt e-mai...
my e-mailing patients seemed to fall into recognizable groups: &quot;jokers&quot;, &quot;data junkies&quot;, &quot;just the facts&quot;, &quot;requesters&quot; and &quot;why? why? why?&quot;.  To keep up with the volume of e-mails, it seemed to help to provide some guidance in the way I responded to their e-mail - both in content and style.  Gentle redirection, not indulging tangential comments, attaching approrpriate links or pssting patient ed material all helped streamline the work and move them from a less desirable category into a better one.  There was definitely an efficiency difference compared to my colleague who valued the social interaction much more.  Sometimes I would actually be concerned about not being too quick to answer to avoid unintentionally taking away the advantage of &quot;asynchrony&quot;. and when there were 3 exchanges on the same issue, I picked up the phone.
regards, Jerry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ted,<br />
Just some random thoughts as i reflected on my own experience with pt e-mai&#8230;<br />
my e-mailing patients seemed to fall into recognizable groups: &#8220;jokers&#8221;, &#8220;data junkies&#8221;, &#8220;just the facts&#8221;, &#8220;requesters&#8221; and &#8220;why? why? why?&#8221;.  To keep up with the volume of e-mails, it seemed to help to provide some guidance in the way I responded to their e-mail &#8211; both in content and style.  Gentle redirection, not indulging tangential comments, attaching approrpriate links or pssting patient ed material all helped streamline the work and move them from a less desirable category into a better one.  There was definitely an efficiency difference compared to my colleague who valued the social interaction much more.  Sometimes I would actually be concerned about not being too quick to answer to avoid unintentionally taking away the advantage of &#8220;asynchrony&#8221;. and when there were 3 exchanges on the same issue, I picked up the phone.<br />
regards, Jerry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 6 Reasons why mHealth is different than eHealth by Xbox, Wireless Technologies and Search Engines in Medicine 2.0 &#171; ScienceRoll</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/18/4731/comment-page-1#comment-7237</link>
		<dc:creator>Xbox, Wireless Technologies and Search Engines in Medicine 2.0 &#171; ScienceRoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/2010/02/19/4731#comment-7237</guid>
		<description>[...] 6 Reasons why mHealth is different than eHealth (Ted Eytan, MD) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 6 Reasons why mHealth is different than eHealth (Ted Eytan, MD) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
