We’re speaking on Tuesday at South by Southwest..
As Jay says, we’re speaking tomorrow, at SXSW – The panel is called Sick Clicks, the Evolution of Health Online. See you there.
We’re speaking on Tuesday at South by Southwest..
As Jay says, we’re speaking tomorrow, at SXSW – The panel is called Sick Clicks, the Evolution of Health Online. See you there.
I like this. It demonstrates that our police department acknowledges that this a problem that is affecting a lot of people, and uses a creative way to get the information out.
And PS, if you are coming to visit Washington, DC, take this seriously. Do not use your smart device near a metro doorway or even in a public space, such as seated in a restaurant. You may find its presence in your life a distant memory….
Fellow #epicenter dweller and well known medical publisher “Dr. Val” Jones is going to be covering HIMSS extensively next week, and I’m going to be her guest next Wednesday, March 3, at 8:00 am. I don’t know what I’m going to find or see at my very first HIMSS. Wish me luck.
A few weeks ago, Jack Cochran, CEO of The Permanente Federation (the company I work for) mentioned that he would be speaking alongside Atul Gawande, MD, in DC, and that I should try to come. I didn’t realize fully that he was speaking in front of the Governors of the United States of America, and definitely not that he was going right after The First Lady of the United States, Michelle Obama.
In any event, I got to go, so I’m going to share that experience here.
The First Lady
The First Lady was great. She talked about her family’s values with regard to exercise and eating. She’s leading an important conversation about why we need to treat childhood obesity as a societal issue, with multiple causes and solutions. (Disclosure: Kaiser Permanente is a founding partner in The First Lady’s Partnership for a Healthier America)
She spoke of food deserts, which are communities where families do not have convenient access to grocery stores and purchase processed and other less-healthy foods at convenience stores and corner markets.
I do not live in a food desert currently, but I did last week (this photograph explains it all), and I can definitely relate to the feeling of needing to pack high calorie, high sodium, non-perishable foods into the grocery bag, and how unsettling it feels. Great for The First Lady to work on making healthier food choices available to families in communities across the United States.
Atul and Jack
Of all the things on our country’s governors agendas, it’s impressive to think that they made health care the lead issue of their winter meeting. And equally impressive that they asked to hear from physician leaders first.
The title of this post is from a comment made by Jack that started with, “Don’t say you can’t do this (high quality, patient-centered care) because you’re not KP. We didn’t know we could do it until we did it.“
As Dr. Gawande is very well known (understatement), so here’s a little bit about Jack: He’s a plastic surgeon who delivered care in the fee for service world and became curious about the Kaiser Permanente system in his community in Colorado (“If care was needed, physicians wrote me – ‘please deliver this care’), and became a plastic surgeon in that system. He eventually became the Executive Medical Director of the Colorado Permanente Medical Group where he fostered an environment of physician leadership (of the servant kind), innovation, and personal accountability and responsibility. And, Kaiser Permanente Colorado’s results speak for themselves.
In 2005, I had the good fortune/serendipity to be a student in the national Permanente Medicine and Management course led by Jack, where I and physician peers learned about what we could do to make health care (not just Kaiser Permanente) a better place, starting with us. A lot of the advice I give to others (and to myself) originates from the approach I learned here.
With my excessive interest in patient and family involvement – I picked up on a few significant things said by both leaders:
Blast from the Past – “You have the power”
At the event, I happened to sit behind Mary Selecky, The Secretary of Health for the State of Washington, and amazingly, we both remembered a moment, exactly 10 years ago, in a class at the University of Washington School of Public Health where we learned about making change.
My colleague, Abigail Halperin, MD, and I were students in the School of Public Health, working on ending the sale of tobacco products for profit by the University of Washington, and during the class, Abigail asked Secretary Selecky what she could do about ending this practice. Her answer, to us and the class was, “I don’t have the power as the Secretary, you have it as the student.”
It turned out she was right; the decision to end the practice was ultimately made by the Associated Students of the University of Washington, and we got there by working with the student body, not the Administration, who resisted the change.
The value of physician leadership (in addition to the leadership of every other stakeholder)
The not-so-subtle nudge from Secretary Selecky in 2000 made a difference, just like Atul and Jack will, by using their talents to help others lead.
I know that both physicians vastly understate what they know about how to create change in medicine and health care in a venue like this.
That’s okay, one of my tenets is “frequency is better than duration” – I think this experience will come out over time, and it’s going to be helpful to people who wonder if the impossible is possible, a great role for physicians.
Over the weekend, I received this message from Beverley Kane, MD, who teaches in the Stanford School of Medicine (and who, along with Danny Sands, MD, developed the very very first guideline for e-mail interactions between patients and doctors). Great to see medical schools thinking of this, and I also hope they will consider teaching about how to interact with patients online, including how to write to patients (If any school teaches this now, please post in the comments), and how to share patients’ health data with them online as well.
I sent Beverley a link cloud with resources available from Kaiser Permanente which are available online.
If you have useful information for Beverley, feel free to post links in the comments, or send directly to her at bkane1[atSign]stanford.edu.
Dear Medical and Medical Informatics Colleagues,
Our Stanford Practice of Medicine (Intro to Clinical Practice) course is introducing a segment this spring to teach med students how to maintain rapport with patients while using the electronic health record.
Do any of you, your institutions, or EHR vendors have guidelines, white papers, or teaching materials for EHR etiquette?
Thanks in advance for anything you can send us. I will be happy to share our course materials when finalized.
Beverley
_____________________________________________
Beverley Kane, MD Program Director, Medicine and Horsemanship
Stanford University School of Medicine Center for Education in Family and Community Medicine
http://familymed.stanford.edu/
See Emmy Award-winning Stanford “Medicine & Horses” video on NBC-TV
http://www.horsensei.com/nbcnews.html The Manual of Medicine and Horsemanship: Transforming the Doctor-Patient Relationship with Equine-Assisted Learning http://www.authorhouse.com:80/BookStore/ItemDetail.aspx?bookid=49669
_________________________________________________________
Conditions like this don’t stifle innovation, they ignite it, and it’s one of the several reasons I think mHealth (“the use of wireless communication devices to support public health and clinical practice”) is different than eHealth (which I’m referring to as desktop Web/computer interaction in health/health care).
I credit Susannah Fox, the Internet’s Informant General, for stimulating the thinking. In 2008 at Health 2.0 in San Diego, she said, “Recruit doctors, let e-patients lead, go mobile” and the data she has been generating since has ceaselessly has been pointing to that reality.
More recently, Washington, DC, hosted the mHealth Initiative Networking Conference last week, and this week, Health Affairs hosted a briefing on their latest issue on E-Health in the Developing World (side note, I know I’m behind in noticing this, but I love HealthAffairs new print form factor – less tome-y and more open).
The mHealth Networking Conference was remarkable for me in terms of the spark I noticed on the part of the attendees and the slightly different focus – a little more public health-y, a little more do-great-things-for-society-y. And, I’m going to say it, a little more exciting for someone like me because of the possibilities that go beyond the desktop web. To learn about them in the City where people believe everything is possible, because it is, is just icing on the cake.
So here’s my list:
#1: When we talk about the web, we still worry about the people who are just not online. According to Susannah’s team, its hovering at 26 %. mHealth is different, everyone has a cell phone or is going to get one, relatively speaking. If you compare use visually, the cell phone thermometer shows much greater penetration – all groups are “pushed up” to higher degrees of access.
Wireless internet users’ demographics; this is kind of huge
Speaking of Mexico and the developing world, the parallels are relevant in the United States to vulnerable populaition, and this is another key difference. Desktop web access favors more educated, more affluent people. There’s an inverse relationship when it comes to wireless. Look at this data from December: If you look carefully, you’ll see something amazing. Access statistics for Black and Hispanic respondents are higher for wireless access to the Internet than for Whites. It’s almost as if the “haves/have nots” are reversed. For people interested in reducing disparities, this is…kind of huge. That’s difference #2.
Difference #3 has to do with ease of set-up. When I speak with iPhone developers or people involved in mobile, I hear the words “difficult, challenging,” which is different than what we heard in 1995 when anyone (me included) could code an HTML page and put it up.
Difference #4, when we talk about the web, there’s not a discussion of telecommunications companies and their innovation. When we talk about mHealth, we have to include telecommunications companies. This year at HIMSS10 , in Atlanta, it’s not Sanjay Gupta, MD (whose work I have great respect for) that I want to see speak the most. it’s Dan Hesse, CEO of Sprint/Nextel. People with telecommunications experience, in my opinion will be very important moving forward. In a analogous way, I am as drawn to the CTIA as I am to AMIA .
Difference #5, Reverse Innovation – Unlike the web, a lot of the “cool” stuff has already been pioneered, outside of the United States. Susan Dentzer said it best at the Health Affairs briefing: ” Clearly the US is the developing country when it comes to mHealth“. The term reverse innovation comes from General Electric (this article from Harvard Business Review explains it) , and it means that a lot of the inventing to be done is happening in India, China, South America, and as the article linked to above points out, in Mexico. What may work best is something that comes from a place with far less resources than we have. Kind of what health care, a resource-poor industry when it comes to innovation at the level of public health and primary care, needs.
ZipHealth: Where would you rather track your health; here, or on a desktop website?
Difference #6, it’s more personal. Some of the apps we saw last week, and others I am hearing about, are things that might not work on the desktop web so well, because a desktop or laptop is not as “personal” a device. The idea of storing information on a web site and forwarding to your doctor seems to make more sense on a mobile phone, because it’s something you hold that’s yours, that you can “share” with someone. Not the same for a web site on a computer.
I want to clarify that this is not 6 reasons why mHealth is better or has more scientific evidence behind it. This is just differences. I’ll report on two great papers in the Health Affairs issue on this shortly.
Comments/additions/subtractions welcome.
Pioneering Ideas: How Can Health Data Transform Health and Health Care? – As this blog post says, the Robert Wood Johnson pioneer portfolio is at the famous conference that has the same name as mine.
As I received this message from the PR agency promoting this work on behalf of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, asking me to post the information (which I get regularly from various organizations, I pick and choose what are relevant, organizations are discovering the value of social media):
This week, the Pioneer Portfolio will be at TED2010. While they are there, they will be engaging in discussions about what they see as a truly revolutionary movement in health care toward an approach that is more data-driven and patient-centered. We’ll be sharing that conversation on Twitter by using the hash tag #pioneerdata.
I also was reading this post:
Live-Tweeting Events is Dying. What Can Be Done? – Mark’s Cheeky Posterous
About why or why not Live-Tweeting events is useful or if it should change/morph, and it made me pause and do a little thinking.
I am a “serendipity’s coincidence” user of Twitter, so I see what I see whenever I see it, so it feels to me like livetweeting is waning, but I don’t know if it is or not.
Then, I watched the YouTube video posted in the above RWJ blog (which stars some of my favorite people) and thought about some of the comments which were that “data is only useful if it’s actionable/contextual.”
Live-tweeting being potentially useless, data only being useful if contextual and actionable….
I didn’t come away with any disagreement of the above ideas at all. Just a twist – the LEAN/Toyota (yes, Toyota) expression, which is, “Seeing the impact of what you do.”
And so, here’s my tie-in of all of this – I think data by itself IS useful, and Live-tweeting by itself IS useful.
Why? Because if the impact that comes from making it available in the first place.
On the issue of livetweeting, it may not matter to me whether an event is livetweeted or not, or whether those tweets cause me to take action. It does, however, matter, if an event is not allowed to be livetweeted or such transparency is encouraged. About a year ago, I was invited to an event hosted by an organization that I am not affiliated with and summarily told that no tweeting would be allowed. No discussion about whether this could be done responsibly, or whether there could be benefit from the work and ideas of such happening. Just, “No.”
The impact? If I were to be invited by that same organization to another event, I would prioritize an event that’s more open, or I’d decline altogether, mostly because I’m concerned that the interest in learning and growing just isn’t there.
On the issue of data being actionable, I encourage people to think about just the impact of the data being available, and honestly, I worry that the expression, “it has to be actionable” will be used by some with less noble intentions to decide, “therefore we shouldn’t make it available.”
So in conclusion
With thanks and respect for the great ideas in the above blog posts, and I hope that My Open Notes demonstrates what others have written about for over 40 years, that this topic didn’t need to be researched in the first place….
This post may seem off-topic for this blog; however,
And the information is this – Visa Enhancement Services, which exists to help card holders “Take advantage of the security, flexibility, and convenience that come with a Visa card,” including an auto-collision damage waiver, does not offer this security, flexibility or convenience for Zipcar drivers.
I have gone ahead and pasted in their letter of determination to me, again, in the interest of helping other customers understand what might happen in a situation where they attempt to use this benefit, now that my situation is concluded (click to see full size).
To quote (again, to help the search engines out there):
Zipcar Members entered into a “Vehicle sharing service subscription contract” with Zipcar and not a rental agreement. Zipcar Member’s relationship as a member of Zipcar, entitled you the use of an automobile but did not constitute a “rental transaction” as required under the terms and conditions of the Visa Auto Rental CDW Program.
Now, I did discuss this carefully with Visa Enhancement Services, including the explanation that DC charges Zipcar rentals with a Rental car tax. The individual I spoke with there said that it doesn’t matter if my locality considers this a rental car. Regarding the issue of Collision Damage Waiver, ZipCar does offer a buy down to zero deductible, and I did decline that.
The final person I spoke with at Visa Enhancement Services was professional and cordial, but ultimately unhelpful in creating understanding around Visa’s stance on this issue. He suggested that the Zipcar company initiate a written dialogue with the head of their Division, on behalf of Zipcar members. He stated that Visa doesn’t get that many claims from Zipcar members; I honestly find that hard to believe.
So, despite what the letter says (“we reserve the right to accept this claim later” – really, why put that language in there if there’s no intention of doing such a thing…), I don’t think Visa’s going to change their mind on this one.
Most importantly for me, I should state, the damage I experienced was not personal injury inducing to anyone or anything, which is infinitely more important than the financial impact, and there are options to mitigate that going forward (see below)
Compared to Visa, a different (and great) experience with Zipcar
I have to say, they’ve been terrific. I contacted them right away using their procedures and they were understanding that I am not the only one who has experienced this with Visa, and they managed the repair and restoration of my membership quickly and efficiently. After all was said and done, they even offered an unsolicited token of gratitude for my loyalty as a customer.
And that’s on top of the fact that every interaction that I have had with them has had an excellent level of customer service, from start to finish.
Which one do you like / trust more when this happens?
There’s a social media aspect to all of this…
For people in this situation, and from what I’ve seen online, there’s going to be a tendency in this situation to decide whether you “liked” dealing with Zipcar or Visa, and ultimately whether you “trust” Zipcar or Visa, or really any company who you approach about their assurances and ability to deliver on them.
I have read some commentary online about whether Zipcar’s policies are unclear or if their approach to a situation like this is confusing. At the same time, I’ve stopped owning a car since 2008, and I don’t miss it one bit, mostly because of Zipcar’s flawless customer service and approach to making cars available only when they are needed. That means a lot. And it’s worth putting it out there for others to appreciate.
From the perspective of my experience then, of the two, Zipcar is the organization that is doing more to support people like me in making the decision to keep 2-6,000 unnecessary pounds of aluminum, glass, and steel out of my community.
So there you have it, entered into the record of the Internet.
if anyone coming across this finds themselves in the middle of a seeming tug of war over this issue feel free to use my experience to innovate around a creative solution that supports yourself, your community, and a healthy environment.
Police: Robbers Targeting Pedestrians with iPhones « Borderstan (Washington, DC) – Washington, DC Metro Police are now advising people not to use iPhones of an increase in robberies with a specific target, the iPhone, that device specifically, in public. This is a big deal, in a previously-thought-of-as-safe part of the city.
People like me wish Apple would sell a version of its headphones that are not white. These appear to be setting us up as targets.
I was a recent victim of an iPhone snatcher in downtown Washington, DC, and in comparison to some of the crimes detailed in the blog post above, I consider myself very lucky.
It was going to happen eventually that wearing a $600 device would increase personal crime. I can’t help thinking that there’s a way to harness the wisdom of crowds and the very technology being sought after – maybe a "findmyiphone" aggregator that could help communiites and the police zero in on where these devices are ending up.
It’s worth noting that my stolen phone localized itself to the same location on multiple days, near a large Washington, DC, shopping mall, in Pentagon City, before I remotely secured it and wiped it clean (what a great feature – thank you Apple!).
To attest to the seriousness of this issue, even our local gym is passing on the warning:
Attention Members:There has been a report of an increase in robberies over the past week in the Golden Triangle/U Street area. Although not directly related to the club we thought it would be helpful to pass along the following alert from Metro P.D.
Golden Triangle Crime Alert
The Metropolitan Police Department has asked us to pass along the following information. As of late there has been an increase in street robberies around the DC Metro area. The Second District is not immune from these incidents. There is not a specific suspect lookout but there is a very specific target – the iPhone. To help combat this problem, MPD is asking the users of all phones and PDAs to use good street sense when carrying and using your mobile device.
Always be aware of your surroundings. It is a good idea to use your phone while stationary in a spot that will enable you to talk and observe your surroundings at the same time. Keep your mobile device close to your body and make sure it is out of sight when not in use. Please pass this along to reach as many people as possible.
Thank you,
MaryKay MoeOperations Coordinator
Golden Triangle Business Improvement District
As Washington, DC is the #epicenter of many innovations (and health care transformation), it is also a leader in many social issues, some not so enjoyable. Let our experience prevent others from having the same in this case.