Ted Eytan, MD

e-Health. Patient empowerment. Washington, DC.

Reduced Publishing Schedule

It’s time again for an Internet Holiday. You can read about the philosophy behind this from past holidays. Once, maybe twice a year is a good idea.

Comments and trackbacks will be locked in the meantime.

I’ll leave things with a nice summer photograph, the Washington Nationals Baseball Park, Washington Monument in the distance.

Washington Nationals

No Comments yet | Add Yours

While at Massachusetts General Hospital last week, as a guest of The Stoeckle Center for Primary Care Improvement, I was invited to meet the team at the Laboratory of Computer Science based at MGH. The Lab of Computer Science produces the OnCall series of clinical web portals, which are a front end to the Computer Stored Ambulatory Record medical record system.

The reason it is a “series” and not “a front end” is because this system actually has brands that are specific to the specialties and care that it supports. Here’s a picture from a computer screen that shows them:

OnCall Brands


Why is this interesting? Because it’s doable - this ambulatory record system communicates using an XML platform, and has been doing so since 1996. XML, as I mentioned in a previous post, is an uber-industry standard for moving data across systems outside of health care, and is now getting traction in health care. Having it as a foundation for an electronic health record system back to 1996 has some advantages, like the one you can see above. Different types of care can access the same data differently.


In my usual LEAN way, I asked if I could see OnCall in action, and so I shadowed Henry Chueh, MD during his clinic day (with each patient being asked for their consent before I entered the room). I found the interface to be very user centric, with lots of modern AJAX-y touches, as one would expect for an EHR that is being continually improved by a team of physicians that practice medicine regularly. Back to the XML though, the happiness is not that the user experience is good, it’s that it can be improved perhaps easier than another system because the data is moved around in standard ways. It’s almost like the team could create a patient version of the same record using a style sheet - which is something of a holy grail in patient access, in my opinion.


OnCall is going to be used as the basis for the Ambulatory Practice of the Future, also being designed at MGH. The idea is that a practice that can continuously improve will do best with an electronic system that can do the same, quickly.


There isn’t yet a patient portal attached to OnCall, but one is being worked on under the leadership of Henry and JeanHee Chung, MD, MS, a practicing internist and member of the LCS team. They showed me an early prototype of a patient front end and system named “ACCORD” (Ambulatory Care Compact to Organize Risk and Decision-making) which takes a personal health record one step farther than I have seen, by connecting patients and physicians to agreements around treatment plans. There’s a short summary of the project here at the AHRQ Web Site. I think this would be an exciting development for an electronic system and I was delighted to meet the parents of the OnCall system and get a glimpse into the future of a personal health record that uses data to model patient-centeredness.


Thanks to MGH and the Lab of Computer Science team for the warm welcome. LCS is sort of legendary in Informatics circles in terms of the vision it brought to medicine around the use of computers, and it was good to see in the flesh.
1 Comment | Add Yours

I decided to start recruiting the patient voice by seeing what patients are already writing about their condition on their blogs, using blood pressure as an example. I have set up a link cloud with all of these:

tedeytan’s bookmarks tagged with “patient_voice” on del.icio.us

I have also posted the last several below this. There are several impressive things about this review:

1. Patients are writing about their conditions - we don’t have to go far anymore to listen
2. Even for a condition that some medical providers might consider “not as significant,” there are significant feelings - fear of being diagnosed, fear of treatment, fear of being out of control
3. People are interested in knowing what they can about their conditions so that they can manage them confidently, and they may be asking each other as much (if not more) than their doctor.

Read the links attached to this cloud…and if you have others, post them or direct them to my del.icio.us account.

No Comments yet | Add Yours
No Comments yet | Add Yours
No Comments yet | Add Yours
  • HealthVault : Conference presentations now available… - If you weren't in Bellevue, Washington, in early June, you can do a little catching up on HealthVault. I’ve reviewed these presentations, and the amount of thinking that has gone into the health ecosystem is very impressive. And I’m critical of these things. Of significance, there’s some nice thinking displayed regarding bringing small practices online. Well done.
3 Comments | Add Yours
No Comments yet | Add Yours
No Comments yet | Add Yours
No Comments yet | Add Yours

Winnowings (Patient Voice)

  • Winnowings - A patient goes to her doctor to make a connection between a diuretic and foot pain (likely causing a flare of gout)
2 Comments | Add Yours
  
Random header image... Refresh for more!

Recent Comments

Calendar

July 2008
S M T W T F S
« Jun   Aug »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Photographing Now

Reading Now

Doing Now