<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How do we measure an organization / provider&#8217;s online accessibility to patients?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tedeytan.com/2008/06/24/1140/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2008/06/24/1140</link>
	<description>e-Health. Patient empowerment. Washington, DC.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen Furtado</title>
		<link>http://www.tedeytan.com/2008/06/24/1140#comment-1545</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Furtado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedeytan.com/2008/06/24/1140#comment-1545</guid>
		<description>Access to online persoanl health data, or patient portal *users* are probably best measured via the usage logs (compared with self-reporting via a survey). We want to know how many different people used the portal (logged on to it) in a given period of time. That's a fairly easy number for the IT dept to get. More complicated is what *percent* of potential users that is. Who do we include in that group of potential users? (the denominator problem you mentioned.) In my organization, we will probably measure log-ons/patient/year, with "patient" yet to be defined. Satisfaction and/or the value perceived from that login will probably be a separate measure that is determined by survey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Access to online persoanl health data, or patient portal *users* are probably best measured via the usage logs (compared with self-reporting via a survey). We want to know how many different people used the portal (logged on to it) in a given period of time. That&#8217;s a fairly easy number for the IT dept to get. More complicated is what *percent* of potential users that is. Who do we include in that group of potential users? (the denominator problem you mentioned.) In my organization, we will probably measure log-ons/patient/year, with &#8220;patient&#8221; yet to be defined. Satisfaction and/or the value perceived from that login will probably be a separate measure that is determined by survey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
