This is a community where there are visible reminders everywhere to recommit yourself to what’s important.



This is a community where there are visible reminders everywhere to recommit yourself to what’s important.



The PCHIT blog is moving to its new home at the Center for Information Therapy next week.
We’ll post a link to the new blog here, and then automatically redirect all traffic to the new site.
This blog was started along with the initiative in October, 2007, and will, as planned, move to a site hosted by the Center for Information Therapy. Josh and the IxCenter will maintain things there, including the 141 posts and 155 comments that resulted from this effort.
The new blog will continue to discuss important developments at the intersection of HIT and patient-centered care and build on related work going on at the IxCenter.
Ted will continue to write about his own experiences in health information technology, patient empowerment, reducing disparities, and physician (and patient!) leadership at http://www.tedeytan.com/.
We learned so much from the committed organizations we visited, all of which involve practitioners dedicated to promoting patient-centered care. We also learned, as one medical director colleague once said, that we are living in a hailstorm of innovation. We thank all of the organizations and the people who support them, for their time and interest in their patients and communities.
We also thank the supporters of this work
Grumbach K, Mendoza R. Disparities In Human Resources: Addressing The Lack Of Diversity In The Health Professions. Health Aff. 2008;27(2):413-422. [Accessed March 27, 2008]. This is a nice analysis of solutions from the Family and Community Medicine Team at University of California, San Francisco, to support diversity in the health professions, which unfortunately have not yet reached levels comparable to the general population, especially in allopathic medicine.
There are two concepts that reinforce that this is not just an issue for health care, it is an issue for society, and the people and businesses that depend on a strong health care system:
The business case highlights the customer service and competitive advantages to the health industry of having a workforce that is culturally and linguistically attuned to the increasing diversity of the nation’s health care consumers.
and
A wide group of organizations—including the AAMC and other health professions educational organizations, higher education institutions, consumer groups, and Fortune 500 companies—contributed amicus briefs and other documents in support of the University of Michigan in Grutter v. Bolinger, signifying a more concerted effort to identify and organize stakeholders interested in supporting diversity efforts.
Many physicians, myself included, work in the most downstream parts of this ecosystem, and it’s therefore helpful to consider that there are places we can be to create a more effective care system for everyone. From my travels to date, it’s clear to me that these are worthy investments of my physician colleagues’ expertise. None of us enjoy waking up to a world where the quality of health care is dependent on things other than the fact that you are a human being.
A lot of stuff going on this week…
Bodenheimer T, Berenson RA, Rudolf P. The Primary Care-Specialty Income Gap: Why It Matters. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(4):301-306.[Accessed March 27, 2008].
Sepulveda M, Bodenheimer T, Grundy P. Primary Care: Can It Solve Employers’ Health Care Dilemma? Health Aff. 2008;27(1):151-158. [Accessed March 27, 2008].
Where I am living and working, primary care is receiving a lot more attention – more than I have ever experienced it getting. That could be because I have been living and working in a place (Seattle) where primary care and family practice is well understood and now I am in a place where maybe it is not understood as well (Washington, DC), or there could be a change in conversation happening nationally. I think it’s a little of both.
I recently read the attached articles – there are many more from these distinguished authors, and for every article, many many blog posts covering the topic of primary care survival.
The articles, for me, highlight the idea that from a societal perspective, primary care helps people achieve their life goals through optimal health. The societal part means that this is good for people, their families, their employers and their communities. Paul Grundy, MD, in particular is raising awareness of the role of employers in supporting a balanced care system.
The articles also highlight that not everyone is taking a societal perspective in the discussion. From the Bodenheimer article:
It’s unclear whether the medical profession – with different specialties having distinct monetary interests and different estimations of the professional value of their work – can agree on substantial changes in payment policy on its own
This strikes me as a wise statement to make based on current conditions. At the same time, in the work I have done to help transform a health care system using LEAN (Toyota Management System), I have learned that this condition can change, and physicians can come together, if the view we take is one about the patient (which is really one about society).
When I walk into a room in my health informatics role, I feel that I am representing myself as a physician, rather than as a family physician. This helps me be aware of the contributions my specialty colleagues make to improving primary care and the skills of the people who deliver it. Their contributions are significant. Because of this experience and my experience practicing the Toyota Management System, I have an interest in the inclusion of all physicians (and all patients) in this discussion. I am wary of writing that implicitly or explictly states that the tension should be or is between primary care and specialty care. I think our patients and our society are wary of that idea, too.
I’ll end my comments there and welcome others’ ideas.