Now that I am relocated in a different city, I don’t have access to routine healthcare, just for urgencies, based on a cooperative arrangement with a sister organization here. This is appropriate and actually generous considering the type of coverage offered at home. At the same time, though, I will carry the feeling of needing to take extra care of myself. My personal physician doesn’t live here anymore.
Before I left, I did take a look at my preventive care schedule, and it so happens that it was time for a cholesterol check. I’ve achieved a “new level of adulthood,” and the guideline has shifted the screening age downward, so we’ve met in the middle. When I told my boss it was time, he asked me if I would be willing to take a statin if it turned out I was high risk (I haven’t been checked in a really long time). This isn’t something I was really prepared to think about. Even the most basic preventive test causes anxiety.
Because I access our health system like any other patient, I secure e-mailed my doctor who ordered the test, and before I left, I stopped in at one of our labs to get my blood drawn. When I arrived at home the next day, I was greeted with an e-mail reminder that my test was complete and ready for viewing. A relatively anxious login to our secure Web portal gave me the answer.
On reflection, I got to experience this quickly, in private, on my terms (different time zone, other side of the continent), and with the opportunity to follow-up whenever I want. 24 hours from blood draw to answer, and only this long because I didn’t have the opportunity to login sooner.
Every time I have an experience like this, I ask myself if there is any question that I am going to advocate for this for every patient in every care system. Maybe a better question is, what does it mean to take 1-2 weeks of anxiety and reduce it to a few hours? A lot.
2 Responses
Eric L
September 27th, 2007 at 10:00 pm
1Ted - Re: Statins - - we ‘ve begun to explore this in a rather unique “laboratory”
The linkage of GH pharmacy data with neuropath. See the paper in NEUROLOGY by Ge (Gail) Li published recently and picked up by the lay press - including I think the Wa Post. Not definitive but intriguing.
Thanks for your e-mail
Eric
Jon Wald
September 28th, 2007 at 9:05 am
2Hi Ted,
Just learned you’re on sabbatical - and hoping to hear more about your plans.
Best,
Jon
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Recent Comments
Popular: September
Recent Links
Bookmarks
Meta
Calendar
Photographing Now
Reading Now
Doing Now
Tags
adoption Advisory Group airlines AMA Apple apple_in_the_enterprise blogs Boston California California Healthcare Founcation CCHIT ccr chcf chcfp cmio CMS costs DC disparities disruption diversity eClinicalWorks eCW ehr employer Employers employment enterprise2.0 GenX GenY Georgia google health2.0 health2con health_plans HIT_before_HIE hoshin_kanri hr hypertension Informatics innovation Institute for Family Health iPhone Kaiser Permanente Kaiser_Permanente Leadership leadership_blogs LEAN macintosh media medical_education medical_home medications Microsoft music my own cio New York npr optimism participation participatory medicine participatory_medicine patient access Patient and Family Centered Care patient_access patient_centered_care patient_empowerment patient_voice PCHIT Personas Photos phr physicians presentations prevention privacy purchasers reimbursement RHIO safety safety net Seattle Small Practices Software standards toyota transparency Twitter walking Web2.0 wordpress
Archives
Categories